Category: Articles

  • Emma Raducanu gets lavish rankings prediction from former world No 1

    Emma Raducanu gets lavish rankings prediction from former world No 1

    Former world No 1 Mats Wilander has set Emma Raducanu a bold rankings target, but he admits she has yet to prove she has what it takes to win another Grand Slam title.

    This year’s US Open marks the fourth anniversary of Raducanu’s remarkable win in New York, as she came through qualifying at Flushing Meadows and won her first Grand Slam title without dropping a set throughout the tournament.

    That win fired Raducanu to international superstardom and she has struggled to back up the hype that inevitably built up around her after that breakthrough victory.

    Now 22, Raducanu is showing real signs that she can compete with the game’s best players once again, with two recent performances against world No 1 Aryna Sabalenka confirming she is not far behind the best in the women’s game.

    Now Wilander has given his verdict on Raducanu ahead of the US Open, as he predicted she will be back in the top 10 of the WTA Rankings soon, but he admits the jury is out on whether she can win a second Grand Slam title.

    More Tennis News

    Chris Evert responds to her & Jimmy Connors, Carlos Alcaraz & Emma Raducanu ‘relationship’ comparisons

    US Open mixed doubles – how tennis chiefs turned a big opportunity into a farce

    “I think what’s cool is that we’re seeing a better version than the one that she was when she was 18, even though she won the US Open,” said Wilander, as he prepares to join the Eurosport broadcasting team at the US Open.

    “By a better version, I mean she’s still playing the same kind of tennis. She’s trying to be aggressive.

    “She’s very complete in all aspects of her game and her serve has become better. Obviously, she’s stronger physically at 22 than she was at 18.

    “Mentally, I’m not sure. I think mentally is the big question. Is she confident enough that she can overpower some of these players because obviously Sabalenka and Iga are bringing a different level than the players that she beat at the US Open four years ago.

    “I don’t think we can look at Emma Raducano and say that she has another Grand Slam victory in her yet. She has to prove a few more things before we talk about her like that. 

    “But we are looking at an Emma Raducanu that can break into the top 10 here in a year or two, in my eyes, and I’m pretty convinced that she will break into the best players in the world.

    “If we ask can she win another major? That’s another completely different question for another day.”

    Mats Wilander

    Mats Wilander is part of the Eurosport commentary team

    Raducanu has been criticised for constantly changing her coach since that US Open win in 2021, with Wilander suggesting she needs to stick with Francisco Roig after adding him to her team as lead coach last month.

    “I would say that it was mismanaged immediately after the US Open because I know the coach that she had at the time did not stay on for very long,” he added.

    “More importantly for Emma Raducano, she was injured. She got injured straight away, and she’s had wrist operations, she’s had operations in a lot of places, and she hasn’t been able to play. So I think that we have to put Emma Raducano in a different situation.

    “But as a general thing, yes, I think that you should keep your coach. If you had success as a 17, 18-year-old, 19-year-old with one coach, you should keep that coach for at least three or four more years to see how far you can get with that coach.”

    Watch the US Open on Eurosport and HBO Max

    READ NEXT: Iga Swiatek and Jack Draper secure cash windfall as Carlos Alcaraz and Emma Raducanu crash out

    The post Emma Raducanu gets lavish rankings prediction from former world No 1 appeared first on Tennis365.

  • Iga Swiatek and Jack Draper secure cash windfall as Carlos Alcaraz and Emma Raducanu crash out

    The revamped US Open mixed doubles was shrouded in negativity in the days leading up to the event, but the relative success of the opening day of action confirmed that tennis chiefs wasted a golden chance with this innovation.

    Big crowds, smiles on court, star names coming on to court one after the next and plenty of entertainment confirmed this brand of quick-fire could have a future.

    Yet it needs to be modified and improved before it can be described as a Grand Slam event.

    If this mixed doubles tournament were being staged as a new facet of fan week at the US Open, a prelude event to the main singles draws, everyone would welcome the action being served up by the stars who are competing in good-quality matches.

    Where this went wrong was declaring the winners would be Grand Slam champions, as that devalues the glory of winning one of the biggest stages in our sport.

    More Tennis News

    US Open mixed doubles – how tennis chiefs turned a big opportunity into a farce

    2025 US Open women’s singles seeds: Sabalenka, Swiatek, Gauff top 3, Raducanu needs withdrawal

    That said, the sporting world has enjoyed the spectacle served up by the biggest names in tennis in New York, even though most of the A-listers were beaten.

    The dream team of Carlos Alcaraz and Emma Raducanu were beaten by Jack Draper and Jessica Pegula in their opening match, with Novak Djokovic, Alexander Zverev, Elena Rybakina and Naomi Osaka among the other big names beaten on Tuesday.

    The favourites to go all the way and win the title now may be defending US Open mixed doubles champions Andrea
    Vavassori and Sara Errani, who eased into the semi-finals with two big wins in their opening matches.

    Vavassori and Errani will take on the American duo of Christian Harrison and Danielle Collins in their semi-final, while Draper and Pegula will play Iga Swiatek and Casper Ruud, who impressed after coming together a few hours after Swiatek won the Cincinnati Open title.

    All players left in the US Open mixed doubles are now guaranteed $100,000 in prize money each and if they go on to reach the final, that total will jump to $200,000 each.

    The winning pair will share $1million in prize money, with Draper relishing the chance to play alongside doubles specialist Pegula.

    “I’ve got a pretty good partner,” said Draper, after he and Pegula beat Alcaraz and Raducanu.

    “What an experience playing out here against Emma and Carlos. It doesn’t get any better than this, so just a pleasure to be out here playing with such a good player.”

    Tennis chiefs now need to appreciate that this mixed doubles format can be a success, but trying to pretend the winners are Grand Slam champions and playing the event a day after the Cincinnati Open finals are teething problems that need to be ironed out.

    This sport needs to open its eyes to new ideas and innovations, but it isn’t always very good at executing a plan that could have real merit if it included elite doubles players alongside singles players in a more credible format.

    READ NEXT: Emma Raducanu and Carlos Alcaraz beaten in US Open mixed doubles by Jack Draper and Jessica Pegula

    The post Iga Swiatek and Jack Draper secure cash windfall as Carlos Alcaraz and Emma Raducanu crash out appeared first on Tennis365.

  • Who could form a ‘new Big Three’ with Carlos Alcaraz & Jannik Sinner? Rick Macci gives his verdict

    Acclaimed tennis coach Rick Macci has identified Joao Fonseca as “the chosen one” who he believes could threaten the dominance of Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz.

    Alcaraz has won five Grand Slam titles, while Sinner has secured four. Since the start of 2024, the leading duo have collected each of the last seven majors between them.

    Fonseca has been widely touted as one of the most exciting talents in tennis since his emergence on the tour.

    The Brazilian climbed to a career-high ranking of world No 44 after earning two wins to reach the third round at the Masters 1000 in Cincinnati.

    The 18-year-old won his maiden ATP Tour title at the Argentine Open in February after triumphing at the ATP Next Gen Finals in December 2024.

    Speaking exclusively to Tennis365, Macci was asked which player he sees as the biggest long-term challenger to Sinner and Alcaraz.

    “Fonseca is the best young talent I’ve seen. He would be, to me, the chosen one that could be in there,” assessed the American.

    Rick Macci Exclusives

    Legendary coach breaks down how Carlos Alcaraz & Jannik Sinner are ‘changing the game’

    What needs to happen for Novak Djokovic to win a 25th Grand Slam? Legendary coach reveals

    “But he’s a couple years away, even though he could be top 20 by the end of the year, I think.

    “And you gotta remember, as everybody is getting better, so is Sinner and Alcaraz, they’re gonna push themselves to add more sprinkles to their game. They’re just a cut above because of how complete they are.

    “Alcaraz can do every shot from everywhere on the court and he’s the fastest player out there. And Sinner, he’s just rock solid off both sides. His serve’s got a lot better. And mentally, he’s not going anywhere.

    “And so, the bar has been so raised, but listen, there’s always gonna be a next. But I don’t see anybody, for quite a while, joining that mix.

    “And you’ll know it when someone beats them in a Grand Slam and then they follow it up and get in that two, three, four [Grand Slam] category and they start beating Carlos or Jannik a couple times, even at other events.

    “Then, there might be someone [who will] come in and we may get the [new] Big Three. But I don’t see anybody on the horizon.”

    READ NEXT: Carlos Alcaraz could take over as world No 1 as Jannik Sinner’s US Open plans are thrown into chaos

    The post Who could form a ‘new Big Three’ with Carlos Alcaraz & Jannik Sinner? Rick Macci gives his verdict appeared first on Tennis365.

  • Jannik Sinner’s decision on US Open mixed doubles event revealed after Cincinnati retirement

    Jannik Sinner has made his decision on his US Open mixed doubles participation, and as was widely expected, the Italian star has withdrawn.

    The news comes after illness forced Sinner to retire when he was trailing Carlos Alcaraz 0-5 in the first set of the Cincinnati Open final on Monday.

    Sinner was due to begin his campaign at the revamped US Open mixed doubles event today — the opening day of the tournament.

    The world No 1 was set to partner Katerina Siniakova, an 11-time Grand Slam champion in doubles and the current women’s doubles world No 2. However, the duo have been removed from the schedule.

    Sinner and Siniakova were scheduled to face the pairing of Alexander Zverev and Belinda Bencic at 5pm in New York. A replacement team is yet to be announced by the US Open.

    The Italian teamed up with Siniakova after his original partner, Emma Navarro, pulled out last week.

    In an unprecedented change, this year’s US Open mixed doubles event features 16 teams: eight based on the combined singles rankings of the two players and eight wildcard teams.

    The reimagined tournament at the New York Grand Slam will take place on August 19 and 20 in the week before the singles events begin at Flushing Meadows.

    Jannik Sinner News

    US Open mixed doubles – how tennis chiefs turned a big opportunity into a farce

    Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner’s points and prize money from the Cincinnati Open

    In the Cincinnati trophy ceremony, Sinner was apologetic to the crowd as he explained he was unable to continue due to illness.

    “I’m super sorry to disappoint you,” said the four-time Grand Slam champion.

    “From yesterday, I didn’t feel great, I thought I would [get better] during the night, but it got worse. I tried to come out and make it a small match but I couldn’t handle more. I’m very sorry for all of you.

    “I know some of you on Monday have to work or do something else, so I’m really sorry. I’m sorry to disappoint but sometimes it’s like this and we have to accept it.”

    In his press conference, Sinner said: “Yes, of course, disappointed. Didn’t feel great from yesterday. Also during the night, I thought I would recover a bit better, but it was not the case.

    “And I just tried to go out for the fans, trying to give a match. That’s the reason why I went on the court, but it was not meant to be for me today. So, you know, it happens.

    “And, but another way, I don’t want to take anything away from Carlos. He had a great week, great, great tournament again. And, and now the main focus, obviously, is for, for, for US Open. And yeah, now recovery is the most important. And then we see.”

    Sinner is the defending champion at the US Open, with the men’s singles event set to begin on Sunday August 24.

    READ NEXT: Jannik Sinner makes US Open vow after Cincinnati sickness nightmare

    The post Jannik Sinner’s decision on US Open mixed doubles event revealed after Cincinnati retirement appeared first on Tennis365.

  • US Open mixed doubles – how tennis chiefs turned a big opportunity into a farce

    The new-look US Open mixed doubles was a golden chance to showcase tennis to an audience well beyond those who traditionally watch the sport, but those in positions of power have missed a golden chance to make the most of the moment.

    When the initial announcement revealing the mixed doubles tournament at this year’s US Open had been transformed into a two-day, quick-fire competition that would feature the biggest names in tennis and would be worth $1m to the champions, it sent shockwaves through the sport.

    Doubles players were naturally frustrated that an event they were hoping to compete in would now be closed to them, while others suggested that what looks like a glorified exhibition event should NOT end with the winners being declared as Grand Slam champions.

    While the prospect of watching Emma Raducanu teaming up with Carlos Alcaraz and Jack Draper playing alongside Jessica Pegula is a story we all wanted to see, US Open chiefs quickly realised their pre-tournament plan did not fit into a tennis schedule that has no space for new innovations.

    More Tennis News

    US Open mixed doubles prize money confirmed – are Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz pulling out?

    The 5 strongest 2025 US Open mixed doubles pairings – ranked!

    Players and viewers are not enjoying the extended ATP Masters 1000 and WTA 1000 tournaments and with organisers desperately trying to string out this year’s Cincinnati Masters, the final few days of the event have featured limited matches and diluted storylines.

    Playing the singles finals on a Monday rather than the traditional Sunday finish was unwelcome and it has an especially damaging impact on the new US Open mixed doubles event, with Jannik Sinner, Carlos Alcaraz and Iga Swiatek playing important matches in a different state of America less than 24 hours before they play in a ‘Grand Slam’ mixed doubles tournament at the US Open.

    If the new mixed doubles at Flushing Meadows was ever going to be treated seriously, the players competing should have been given time to get to New York and practice with their partners before taking to the court in front of the watching world.

    The reality is, players will practice with their partners a few hours before they take to the court and there are expected to be late replacements for star players after a raft of withdrawals in recent days.

    The top seeds in the event are Jessica Pegula and Jack Draper, but they have never played together before until they take on the Raducanu-Alcaraz dream team.

    Meanwhile, newly crowned Cincinnati champion Swiatek will need to be hasty in her preparation with partner Casper Ruud, as she flies in from Cincinnati a few hours before making her debut in the US Open mixed doubles.

    Organisers have been denied a chance to build up excitedment around this event with photographs and hype over the last few days and amid it all, those doubles players who have been denied the chance to play in the mixed doubles are wondering why one of their revenue streams has been cut off for an event that appears to be getting throw together amid increasing confusion.

    Players have been pulling out and partners have been swapped with more regularity than an episode of Love Island, with tennis chiefs seemingly trying and failing to avoid what may have looked like a credible idea on paper, turning into a pre-US Open joke.

    The show will probably be fun to watch when it gets underway, but the confusion in the weeks and especially the final days before this event has cemented the belief that this event should be reclassified as an star-studded exhibition event and not a Grand Slam mixed doubles tournament.

    US Open Mixed Doubles draw

    Draper & Pegula vs Raducanu & Alcaraz

    Djokovic & Danilovic vs Andreeva & Medvedev

    Swiatek & Ruud vs Keys & Tiafoe

    Osaka & Monfils vs McNally & Musetti

    Siniakova & Sinner vs Bencic & Zverev

    Townsend & Shelton vs Anisimova & Rune

    Williams & Opelka vs Muchova & Rublev

    Errani & Vavassori vs Rybakina & Fritz

    READ NEXT: Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner make US Open mixed doubles decision as draw is confirmed

    The post US Open mixed doubles – how tennis chiefs turned a big opportunity into a farce appeared first on Tennis365.

  • How many points and how much prize money did Iga Swiatek and Jasmine Paolini earn at Cincinnati Open?

    Iga Swiatek has won her maiden Cincinnati Open title after easing to a two-set win over Jasmine Paolini in the final and with it came a points tally boost and a nice cheque.

    Playing in her 13th WTA 1000 final, Swiatek won her 11th trophy at this level and first in Ohio as she defeated her Italian opponent 7-5, 6-4.

    The Pole has now won titles at eight of the 10 WTA 1000 events with only the Dubai Championships and China Open missing from her already crowded CV.

    “It’s nice to check off the list another tournament on the season, one I haven’t won,” she said. “It’s a great motivation to push forward.”

    After struggling during the first half of the season as she failed to win any titles, the 24-year-old ended her drought in brilliant fashion as she won her first Wimbledon crown to take her Grand Slam tally to six.

    Swiatek added: “If I would have to point to two tournaments that would be the hardest ones to win, it would be Wimbledon and Cincinnati, so I’m even more happy. It’s kind of proved that the greatest moments will probably come when you least expect them.”

    Paolini was looking to win her third WTA 1000 trophy and second of the year following her success at her home event in Rome in June, but for now she stays on two titles, having also won the 2024 Dubai event.

    “When the rallies were going, I felt good on the court. The serves were the difference. When she needed an ace, she hit an ace,” the Italian said.

    “It was definitely a positive tournament for me. It wasn’t enough, of course. I just need to improve.”

    WTA Points Earned In Cincinnati

    WTA 1000 winners earn 1,000 ranking points, but they also have to defend points they earned from the corresponding period 12 months ago as the WTA Rankings are based on a rolling 52-week, cumulative system.

    The good news for Swiatek is that she didn’t have any points to defend from 2024 as she lost her 390 points and prize money from her semi-final run last year following her failed drug test during the tournament.

    That means she added the full 1,000 points to her current rankings tally and, as a result, returned to No 2 in the rankings as she moved ahead of Coco Gauff with Aryna Sabalenka still at No 1.

    WTA News

    Iga Swiatek gets bold greatness verdict and Grand Slam prediction from legendary coach

    Former world No 1 claims Iga Swiatek has had an unfair advantage at Cincinnati Open

    Paolini lost in the third round 12 months ago, so she 530 points (650 for reaching the final minus 120 from 2024) and she also moves one place up in the rankings to No 8 with Amanda Anisimova dropping one spot.

    Prize Money Earned In Cincinnati

    Having earned $4,069,500 for winning Wimbledon just over a month ago, Swiatek has added another $752,275 to her bank balance with her latest title.

    The six-time Grand Slam winner has taken her earnings for the 2025 season to $8,207,057 while she now sits on US$41,349,048 in terms of career prize money, which puts her third behind Serena Williams and Venus Williams on the all-time list.

    Paolini received $391,600 for finishing runner-up as she moved to $3,788,147 for the current season, bringing her overall total to $12,258,134. The Italian sits 56th in the all-time list.

    The post How many points and how much prize money did Iga Swiatek and Jasmine Paolini earn at Cincinnati Open? appeared first on Tennis365.

  • Jannik Sinner makes US Open vow after Cincinnati sickness nightmare

    Jannik Sinner did not speak directly to the media after he was forced to retire from his Cincinnati Masters final against Carlos Alcaraz due to illness, but he did release some quotes that appeared to confirm he will not be competing in the US Open mixed doubles tournament on Tuesday.

    A tearful Sinner was forced to quit against Alcaraz and apologised to the crowd for the early end the final, as the match followed a similar story to that of the semi-final, when Alexander Zverev came close to quitting against Alcaraz as he was also suffering from illness.

    Sinner released a statement to the media after his big disappointment in Cincinnati, with the prospect of him returning to the court for the revamped US Open mixed doubles on Tuesday seemingly forlorn after he said he ‘needed a couple of days of recovery’.

    This is what Sinner said in comments released to the media:

    Jannik, tough, tough result today. How are you feeling right now?

    More Tennis News

    Carlos Alcaraz could take over as world No 1 as Jannik Sinner’s US Open plans are thrown into chaos

    Jannik Sinner tipped to pull out of US Open event after Cincinnati nightmare

    JS: Yes, of course, disappointed. Didn’t feel great from yesterday. Also during the night, I thought I would recover a bit better, but it was not the case. And I just tried to go out for the fans, trying to give a match. That’s the reason why I went on the court, but it was not meant to be for me today. So, you know, it happens. And, but another way, I don’t want to take anything away from Carlos. He had a great week, great, great tournament again. And, and now the main focus, obviously, is for, for, for US Open. And yeah, now recovery is the most important. And then we see.

    That’s not the way you wanted to end but overall, how do you assess your week and your time here in Cincinnati?

    JS: Yeah, I feel like a very positive week. I mean, making finals of a Masters event, it’s always an amazing achievement. I feel like it’s an incredible season for me. So we’ll keep going, keep pushing as I say. Now I already have some points where I need to improve if I want to go far in US Open. And it was a good test this week, trying to understand where my level is. My level is, is in a good spot, for sure, but in the other way, there’s still room to improve. So, but yeah, it was, was a great week.

    Now to look forward, how excited are you back, to be back playing in, in the grand slam in New York?

    JS: Yeah, I love Grand Slams a lot. These are the main tournaments for my season and, you know, for my career. So US Open is going to be tough tournament, but in the same time, I’m looking forward to it. If I’m ready, physically and mentally, I’m, I will be ready to push. So as I said, now a couple of days of recovery, and then, you know, we get again back to work, and hopefully we’ll be ready. So for sure, the main goal here in the US.

    Last question. If you have any, how, what do you think that needs to maybe work on in the next few weeks that you can get the level that you need for New York?

    JS: I feel like the, yeah, serve, serve and serve percentage, we will work a lot on that. The physical part, of course, as we saw today, I need to recover, but also improve. And, and, yeah, everything together you know? You try to take out every zero point, whatever percentage, trying to get better. So we will aim to do that and, and yeah, then hopefully I will be ready.

    READ NEXT: Reason why Jannik Sinner quit Cincinnati Masters final against Carlos Alcaraz is revealed

    The post Jannik Sinner makes US Open vow after Cincinnati sickness nightmare appeared first on Tennis365.

  • Grand Slam-winning legend admits Roger Federer will always be his GOAT in Novak Djokovic battle

    Grand Slam-winning legend admits Roger Federer will always be his GOAT in Novak Djokovic battle

    Novak Djokovic has the statistics behind him that confirm he deserves to be hailed as the greatest male tennis player of all time, but it does not mean you cannot view Roger Federer as the game’s ultimate champion.

    That’s the verdict of wheelchair tennis Grand Slam legend Gordon Reid, who admits he will always see Federer as the GOAT of men’s tennis, even though Djokovic has won more titles than his great rival.

    Federer finished his iconic career with 20 Grand Slam titles, leaving him behind Rafael Nadal (22 Grand Slam wins) and Djokovic in the all-time list.

    Djokovic has also won more ATP Masters 1000 events than his two big rivals and has spent more weeks as world No 1 than any player in tennis history, but Reid told Tennis365 that Federer will always be his ultimate champion for so many reasons.

    Speaking to this website at a Play Your Way To Wimbledon event, two-time Paralympic gold medalist Reid explained why his loyalties will always lie with the Swiss maestro.

    More Tennis News

    Tennis legend claims Emma Raducanu’s snipers are ‘too quick to criticise’ ahead of US Open

    Joao Fonseca makes ‘unmatched’ claim as he chooses between Novak Djokovic, Roger Federer

    “I will always be a Federer man,” Reid told Tennis365. “I grew up with Federer as my idol and that has not changed for me.

    Reid suggested Federer was ‘the reason he fell in love with the sport’, as he posted this message on his social media channels when the Swiss champion retired in 2022.

    “Thank you for everything you’ve done for tennis. You were the reason I fell in love with the sport as a young kid,” said Reid.

    “Your style and personality inspired me, like many, many others. It was a pleasure to share the court and learn from you in recent years.”

    Reid’s long-time doubles partner, Alfie Hewett, admitted the dilemma over who should be hailed as the greatest is hard to settle, as he believes Federer and Nadal will always have fans who will not accept Djokovic as the ultimate champion in the men’s game.

    Alfie Hewett and Gordon Reid speak to Tennis365

    Alfie Hewett and Gordon Reid speak to Tennis365

    “It’s tough because from a records perspective, it’s Novak,” said Grand Slam-winning legend Hewett.

    “All of these guys did unbelievable things for our sport and it’s hard to separate them and say who is the all-time best.

    “They are just an unbelievable trio of competitors and we can all still learn a lot from what they achieved and their longevity in the sport.”

    Tennis legend John McEnroe is among those who has suggested current world No 1 Jannik Sinner and his big rival Carlos Alcaraz have taken tennis to a new level after taking over as the new kings of men’s tennis after Federer, Nadal and Djokovic’s era of dominance came to an end, yet he admits that debate will never be resolved.

    “Sinner and Alcaraz have demonstrated over the course of the last 18 months how good they are. Those two are amazing to watch,” stated Hewett.

    “I watched most of their final at Wimbledon and I was just in awe of the levels they were producing. The quality, the level, the endurance, the pace they are hitting was just something to admire.”

    Reid went on to argue that the rush to suggest Sinner and Alcaraz may be better than the ‘Big 3’ of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic may be a little hasty.

    “It feels like there is a bit of recency bias when people say these kinds of things,” he added.

    “Maybe it’s easy to forget how good Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and Andy Murray were when they were at their best.

    “I guess no matter what you think about this debate, you are never going to see a peak Federer or Nadal against Sinner and Alcaraz, so we just have to enjoy these two for what they are doing now.”

    READ NEXT: ‘Destroyed’ Marcos Baghdatis picks GOAT between Djokovic, Nadal, Federer

    Supported by long-time Vodafone ambassadors Alfie Hewett OBE and Gordon Reid OBE, Play Your Way to Wimbledon, powered by Vodafone, aims to make the game more accessible for all and inspire the next generation with the opportunity to compete on Wimbledon’s world-famous grass courts.

    The post Grand Slam-winning legend admits Roger Federer will always be his GOAT in Novak Djokovic battle appeared first on Tennis365.

  • Djokovic, Alcaraz, Sinner, Zverev: 7 top ATP stars who have criticised 12-day Masters format

    A growing contingent of high-profile players on the ATP Tour have made it clear that they are not a fan of the 12-day Masters 1000 tournaments.

    As part of ATP chairman Andrea Gaudenzi’s OneVision plan, seven of the nine Masters 1000 tournaments have been expanded to 12 days: Indian Wells, Miami, Madrid, Rome, Canada, Cincinnati and Shanghai. The singles main draws at these events now feature 96 players.

    Monte Carlo and Paris are the only Masters events that still have the traditional single-week, 56-player format.

    Here, we look at the criticisms seven big names have levelled at the controversial new Masters 1000 format.

    Jannik Sinner – “We lose a little bit of the days of the week”

    World No 1 Jannik Sinner became the latest star to weigh in on the topic after reaching the final at the 2025 Cincinnati Masters.

    “My personal view, I love the one-week events,” the Italian said.

    “I love it when you see that the tournament in Monaco, for example, you have for Monte Carlo, you have this one-week event, and you have the first-round matches which are incredibly good. And if one good seeded-player loses, the next match is an incredible match still, and you have the quarter-finals and you know exactly when you buy the tickets.

    “You have the quarter-finals and then you have the semi-final, which is Saturday, and then you have finally Sunday. And now I lost a little bit of the view of when does actually a finalist [play], because it used to be always Sunday.

    “Now, here [in Cincinnati] it’s Monday. In Toronto, it’s Wednesday or Thursday. So it’s difficult even for us players. We lose a little bit of the days of the week, I would say.”

    Carlos Alcaraz – “One-week format is better for tennis”

    During the 2025 Barcelona Open, Carlos Alcaraz declared: “The one week ones are better. Some will think that in two weeks there are days of rest, but that is not the case.

    “You train, you have to mentally prepare for the game, prepare for it… you’re not resting, really. It’s two full weeks. That’s why I prefer the one-week Masters 1000. For me, it’s better for tennis.”

    Novak Djokovic – “I’m personally, overall, not a fan”

    In May 2023, Novak Djokovic said: “It depends really from which angle you’re looking at it. I mean, I’m personally, overall, not a fan of that because I feel like we already have four Grand Slams a year that take two plus one week eventually if you go all the way with training.

    “You spend 10 to 12 weeks only in Grand Slams. Now we’re going to have eight out of nine 1000 events be the same for next year: pretty much a two-week event.

    “As I said it depends from which perspective you are looking at. If you’re a fan, of course an extra day of seeing the top players is great because you have more tennis in your city. I understand from that point of view.

    “You mentioned that it might be advantage because of the recovery. Yes, it could be the case in that given tournament.

    “But then if you play all the big events on clay, for example, you played Indian Wells and Miami, that is also kind of a month duration for two events, then you play Monte Carlo, Barcelona, then back to back Rome and Madrid, if you play really well and go all the way, you’re maybe not the freshest for Roland Garros.”

    Tennis News

    Novak Djokovic sparks US Open injury doubts as practice video emerges

    Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner make US Open mixed doubles decision as draw is confirmed

    Alexander Zverev – “I have not heard a single player say that they love the two-week Masters events”

    Appearing on the Nothing Major podcast, Alexander Zverev said: “You have the nine Masters 1000 events, which are mandatory; most of them are two-week-long events now, except Monte-Carlo and Paris Bercy — which I think are the best two weeks now on the ATP calendar.

    “I think for a fan and every single tennis player, Paris Bercy was awesome last year. You get there, you play your five matches, and you get out of there.

    “You do not have to stick around or practice in between matches. That is how Masters events used to be and I think all the players loved it.

    “I am not a fan of where this is going, because if you take Alex de Minaur, for example. He played his last match at Davis Cup on the 25th November, and he played his first match of the United Cup on the 27th December.

    “So you have a month of off-season. How are you going to take two weeks off and prepare your body for a new season? You don’t have the time to do those things any more.

    “I think this is one subject where the ATP has to really think about it and find a solution about it, and to be honest, I have not heard a single player say that they love the two-week Masters events. I don’t even think the fans like that.

    “They don’t like waiting for two days for their favourite player to play again. I understand tennis is a business, but I am not sure that business plan is working very well right now.”

    Jack Draper – “The big thing is, I think the quality can suffer a little bit”

    During the 2025 Madrid Masters, Jack Draper said: “I think the way the tour is at the moment and these two-week events and less weeks to be at home, less weeks to train, it just seems like you’re on a constant rabbit wheel, and there’s no way off it.

    “I think that’s scary to think about as a player. You know, to think that, look, I know we’re earning good money, and we’re playing in front of great crowds, and something I love to do, but it’s mentally very, very taxing.

    “[It’s] something that I hope that potentially the ATP and the tours come together at some point and, I don’t know, clean it up a little bit, I suppose, to make it so that there is a bit more space to train and to work on our bodies.

    “I think for me, the big thing is, I think the quality can suffer a little bit. I think there’s a lot of top players who are in and out with their performances, and it’s just purely because it’s just overplaying.

    “People look on TV and they think, ‘Oh, that was a bad performance’ and stuff. It is mentally difficult every day to show up and to give it a hundred percent. And, you know, we have lives as well, there’s things going on off the court all the time. We’re not robots.

    “I think it is a scary proposition what’s ahead, you know, the fact that it is a long career. But then again, you know, I don’t have to play until I’m 35, I can do everything and get the best out of myself, and I’ll stop when I feel like I’m ready.”

    Taylor Fritz – “If we can lengthen the off-season…”

    Speaking during the 2025 Canadian Open, Taylor Fritz said: “To be honest, the way I see it, if we’re going to have this stretch of three weeks, if we’re going to go back to how it used to be, one week each, if it’s going to mean we’re going to add another tournament, then I would be against it.

    “But if it’s going to mean that we make these Masters 1000s one week and we can lengthen the off-season, to give those extra weeks back at the end of the season, and give us a six/seven week off-season rather than a four week off-season, that would be massive and I would be way in favour of doing the one week events.”

    Stefanos Tsitsipas – “A backwards move”

    In a post on Twitter in November 2024, Stefanos Tsitsipas wrote: “The two-week Masters 1000s have turned into a drag. The quality has definitely dropped.

    “Players aren’t getting the recovery or training time they need, with constant matches and no space for the intense work off the court.

    “It’s ironic that the @atptour committed to this format without knowing if it could actually improve the schedule, but the quality likewise. Paris got it right, done in a week. Exciting and easy to follow. Just how it’s supposed to be.

    “If the goal was to ease the calendar, extending every 1000 to two weeks is a backwards move. Sometimes, it feels like they’re fixing what wasn’t broken.”

    READ NEXT: What needs to happen for Novak Djokovic to win a 25th Grand Slam? Legendary coach reveals

    The post Djokovic, Alcaraz, Sinner, Zverev: 7 top ATP stars who have criticised 12-day Masters format appeared first on Tennis365.

  • What prize money will 2025 Cincinnati Open men’s and women’s singles champions receive?

    The Cincinnati Open men’s and women’s singles finals have been set, and tennis fans have plenty to dig their teeth into on Monday.

    ATP fans will get the chance to enjoy the latest instalment of Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz’s rivalry when they meet in the men’s singles final, a fourth straight ‘big’ final between the two.

    While, the women’s final also puts together a previous Grand Slam final line-up, with Iga Swiatek and Jasmine Paolini both looking for their second title of 2025.

    A total of 1,000 ranking points is up for grabs for the winner of the men’s and women’s singles titles, but what prize money is available in Cincinnati? Here, we take a look.

    Men’s singles prize money

    The blockbuster final between world No 1 Sinner and world No 2 Alcaraz is the first on court, with the men’s singles championship match set to start at 3pm local time.

    It will be the 14th career meeting between the two, with Alcaraz leading the head-to-head 8-5, though it was Sinner who prevailed when they last met in the Wimbledon final.

    Reigning champion Sinner will look to become just the fifth man in the Open Era to successfully defend the Cincinnati Open title, while Alcaraz will look to go one win further than his 2023 runner-up finish.

    Both the Italian and Spaniard are already inside the top 10 of men’s singles players to earn the most career prize money, and Monday’s champion is set for another staggering payday.

    Tennis News

    Jannik Sinner joins chorus of stars to criticise 12-day Masters 1000 format

    Iga Swiatek, Jannik Sinner, Carlos Alcaraz face US Open mixed doubles scheduling nightmare

    Whoever prevails between Sinner and Alcaraz will earn a staggering $1,124,380, the biggest prize money payout in Cincinnati Open history.

    That is up on the $1,049,460 that Sinner earned for his 2024 triumph twelve months ago, with the runner-up prize money also set to increase.

    Meanwhile, whoever is beaten in Monday’s final will earn $597,890 in winnings, up from the $573,090 earned by the beaten 2024 finalist Frances Tiafoe.

    Women’s singles prize money

    An intriguing women’s singles final, set to start at 6pm local time, sees a bang-in-form Swiatek face off against the ever-resilient Paolini, with both women looking for a first Cincinnati title.

    After semi-final defeats in 2023 and 2024, Swiatek’s victory over Elena Rybakina on Sunday powered her into her first Cincinnati Open final, while Paolini battled past Veronika Kudermetova.

    World No 3 and third seed Swiatek enters as a pretty significant favourite for the final, dropping just one set across her five previous encounters against seventh seed Paolini.

    The winner of the women’s singles title in Cincinnati does not earn as much as the men’s champion, though there is still a significant payout up for grabs.

    Whoever prevails between Swiatek and Paolini will earn an impressive $752,275 in winnings, up from the $523,485 won by 2024 champion Aryna Sabalenka twelve months ago.

    Meanwhile, the runner-up will be awarded $391,600 in prize money, up from the $308,320 won by Jessica Pegula for reaching the final back in 2024.

    Victory for Swiatek would push her closer to Venus Williams in the all-time WTA prize money standings, potentially moving up into second place in the near future.

    Read Next: What Iga Swiatek and Jasmine Paolini said ahead of their Cincinnati Open showdown

    The post What prize money will 2025 Cincinnati Open men’s and women’s singles champions receive? appeared first on Tennis365.